|
Additional Books by Floyd Jones:
Ripped out of the Bible
by Floyd Nolen Jones, Th.D., Ph.D.
|
|
|
"Of the 3,000 plus Greek
manuscripts of the N.T., about 1700 are from the 12th - 14th
centuries. They, along with 640 copies from the 9th - 11th centuries,
are in basic agreement on approximately 99% of the words of the
N.T. As a group, however, this majority disagree considerably
with most of the copies from the early centuries - which also
differ considerably among themselves. This, then, is the situation
that has given rise to the debate over the original wording of
the New Testament. Nevertheless, despite all the variations,
nearly all of the words of the N.T. enjoy over 99% attestation
from the extant Greek MSS/mss. Only about 2% have less than 95%
support and fewer than 1% of the words have less than 80% (and
most of these differ only slightly).
Yet for the past 100 years, the
world of scholarship has been dominated by the view that this
majority text is a secondary and inferior text. Scholars have
rejected that we have had the true text of the originals all
along and have thus attempted to reconstruct the original text
of the N.T. on the basis of the few early manuscripts. But as
these copies differ considerably among themselves, the result
has been an eclectic "patchwork quilt". The editors
of the dominant eclectic Greek text of today have usually followed
a single Greek MSS and in dozens of places they have printed
a text not found in any known Greek copy! The discrepancy between
this eclectic text and the majority reading is about 8%. That
would amount to 48 full pages of discrepancies in a 600 page
text. Around 1/5 of that represents omissions in the "minority
text" such that it is about 10 pages shorter than the majority
text. Nearly all modern versions of the Bible are based on this
"minority text" whereas the King James is based on
an identical twin brother of the "majority text". This
is why so many verses, phrases, etc. familiar to users of the
KJB are missing in the modern versions.
The question is which of these
two Greek texts is the Word of God?"
To order Ripped Out of the Bible, contact:
KingsWord Press
P.O. Box 5040
Goodyear, AZ 85338
Attention: Craig Jacobs
Phone: 877-KJBIBLE toll free
Fax: 602-325-0106
The Septuagint: A Critical
Analysis
by Floyd Nolen Jones, Th.D., Ph.D.
|
|
|
"The Septuagint (LXX) is
a very old translation of the Hebrew Scriptures (our Old Testament)
into Hellenistic Greek. This statement alone is almost the only
hard fact concerning this translation that is truly verifiable.
The vast majority of modern academia does not consider the "Hebrew"
Bible and the Old Testament portion of our "Holy" Bible
to be one and the same entity. Indeed, many laymen as well as
numerous pastors may be surprised to "learn" that,
according to these same academicians, the original text of God's
Word has been lost and is in need of "recovery".
Modern scholarship upholds that
there are three families of Old Testament manuscripts. Most believe
that all three must be compared in order to arrive at the original
text. The three are the Hebrew Masoretic Text, the Samaritan
Pentateuch, and the Septuagint. Because the LXX is supposedly
1100 plus years older and as it reads very different from the
oldest extant Hebrew manuscripts, text critics presume that the
LXX was translated from an older more reliable Hebrew text. Believing
the LXX contains readings that have been lost or corrupted in
the Hebrew Scriptures, these critics hold that the Septuagint
may be used in determined places to "correct and restore"
these adulterated readings. This illustrates the important position
which the LXX has attained in Old Testament textual critical
circles. Indeed, one constantly reads in the relevant literature
that it was "the" Bible of the early Christians. But
- we wonder - is such veneration of the Septuagint by academia
justified. Does the New Testament actually quote from the LXX?
This fresh critical analysis examines the above with surprising
results."
The Septuagint: A Critical
Analysis
is not currently available in published form.
NOTE: As their distribution is a ministry and not a business venture, Floyd Jones receives neither remuneration nor royalties from the sale of any of these books.
|